I was discharged from my bankruptcy 7/2/2013. And I received a title for the car in the mail, saying that the title was released on 8/1/2013. I did include the car to give back in my bankruptcy. Is that something that happens often, because I was under the impression that they would take it, not send me a title.
They could have made a mistake. You could sign the title over to the creditor or see if you can make a settlement to pay off the loan and keep the car.
That sounds out of the ordinary if you did not pay for the vehicle in the case. If you had an attorney call your attorney so that he or she can review your case to see why it happened.
Sounds a bit odd but the finance company may have decided the amount owed, and discharges, was not worth the hassle of repossessing the car. Take the paperwork to an attorney.
It would not ordinarily happen that you would receive title to your vehicle unless the vehicle had been paid off. I suggest having an attorney review the documents.
The answer to this question depends on details you did not include. If the car was paid for then you should get the title. But if you had not paid for the car then you still need to do so in order to get title. Bankruptcy will clear your obligation to pay the loan but it will not also allow you to keep the car. You still have to pay for it.
Typically, you have to pay off the vehicle after a bankruptcy in order to get the title, but some lenders don't figure it is worth the effort to try hence they sent you the title. A box of chocolates and a thank you card would be an appropriate response.
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.