Trusts Legal Questions

From Google AI: "No, an irrevocable trust is generally not considered a public record; like most trusts, it remains private and details about the trust are not readily accessible to the public unless specific circumstances arise, such as when real estate is transferred under the trust, which may be recorded with the county clerk, but the trust itself is not a matter of public record."  Jack... Read Answer

Please accept my condolences on the loss of your sister. As for your question, I can't actually tell whether your late sister had a valid Will, because you mention that it named an Executor but you also state that it named your other sister as a power of attorney agent and you to make health care decisions, and a normal Will would not do either of those two things. If your sister does not have a valid Will in the first place, which may well be the case if she tried to do her own Will and did not get good legal advice when she was preparing the document, then state intestacy law will apply to her probate assets, and not the document in question. That said, assuming for now that your sister does have a valid Will that names you and your other sister as beneficiaries and your other sister as Executor, the Will must be offered for and admitted to probate before it will become legally binding. That's not a requirement of any bank; it's a requirement of state law. A Will that has not been admitted to probate isn't doing anything legally. The probate process is how you prove that a Will is valid and should be given effect, and it is required before any Executor is appointed and before the Will can actually direct the disposition of a deceased person's assets. So no, a bank will not accept an unprobated Will as valid. The only way you can get access to a bank account that was owned by a deceased individual if you are not either a joint owner with right of survivorship or a designated beneficiary on that account is to have the person's probate estate opened through a probate or an estate administration and to have an Executor or Administrator appointed. Your sister who is named as Executor should consult an experienced probate attorney. Show that attorney the document you believe to be a Will and see if it appears to qualify as a Will. If it does, then your living sister should have the attorney help her offer it for probate. If not, then your late sister's heirs (which might be you and your other sister but may not be- I don't have enough information to be able to tell from your post) will need to see about having her estate opened for administration or whether a Petition for No Administration Necessary might be a good option. Best wishes to you.  ... Read Answer

Hello.  You have a few avenues of relief.  Perhaps a stern-worded letter may serve to move the trustee/executor forward, but if that does not work, you could petition the court for an accounting (if none has been prepared by now) and you may also petition the court to  remove the existing administrator from his/her duties and appoint yourself to take over.  The administrator has a very high fiduciary duty to keep you informed and to properly invest all assets.  Forcing the admin to account is often a good first step.... Read Answer

Generally when funding your revocable trust only you and the current trustee of the trust- which is likely you - would need to sign anything. So, it shouldn't be necessary to get the signature of successor trustees. But, if for some reason a financial institution requires a successor trustee's notarized signature, the successor trustee can have his or her signature notarized in the state in which he or she resides. It does not need to be an Oregon notary.  John SorlieBryant, Lovlien & Jarvis, PCBend, Oregon... Read Answer

In theory, the waiver of an inventory and reports only applies to the normal requirement that those documents be filed with the probate court, and does not mean that they do not have to be provided to heirs. However, in many cases administrators who aren't required to provide those documents to the court don't end up providing them to the heirs, either unless their attorneys push them to do so. Keep in mind, however, that not waiving the bond, inventory, and reporting requirements will likely mean that the estate administration costs more, which in turn may reduce the amount ultimately available for distribution. Not waiving those requirements may provide you with better protection but there are trade offs. You are entitled to have your own attorney represent you on these kinds of issues, and you really should consider getting a consultation. No one in this kind of forum can actually review the entire situation and understand what's going on. Best wishes to you and please accept my condolences on the loss of your father.  ... Read Answer

No, the executor of the Will cannot keep your inheritance.  Just the opposite.  The exector of the Will has to distribute a decdedent's property in accordance with terms of the decedent's Last Will & Testament.  Here's an article I found online which you might find helpful, https://www.findlaw.com/estate/estate-administration/what-does-an-executor-do.html#:~:text=The%20executor%20is%20the%20person,taxes%20comes%20from%20the%20estate. Best regards, Jonathan R. Ratchik, Esq. Kramer, Dunleavy & Ratchik, PLLC 61 Broadway, Suite 2220 New York, NY  10006 (212) 226-6662 www.kdrpilawyers.com  ... Read Answer

You will need a skilled probate/estate/trusts lawyer If you are the beneficiary of a trust, you can, if you believe you are being defrauded, demand an accounting. Note, while you may in mentioned in the trust, it does not necessarily mean that the trust wasn't created to exclude you.   Good luck to you.... Read Answer

You would first have to petition the court for authority to administer your son's estate.  Then take that authority to pursue the assets that rightfully belonged to him.  If your son has a trust or will, it should be probated and suit filed against his father for an accounting, etc.... Read Answer

A lot depends on the type of trust and the purpose for which it is created. If your mother created an irrevocable trust 20 years ago and was trying to keep the assets held by the trust out of her estate for estate tax purposes, then no, she should not have been the trustee of that trust or a beneficiary, because if she were it could defeat the estate tax sheltering purpose of the trust. However, if she was setting up a revocable trust for other estate planning purposes, and she was to be the main beneficiary of the trust during her lifetime, then she definitely could have been her own trustee without it creating any kind of legal or tax problems. As for her then-attorney's statements that a beneficiary of a trust could not be the trustee- that's not really true, and it wasn't true 20 years ago, but it was the more conservative way to plan. If a beneficiary of a trust is also the trustee of the trust, then the beneficiary's ability to handle the trust and make distributions to the beneficiary or his own dependents needs to have certain limits placed on it (I don't have nearly enough room here to detail all of that) OR the trust will effectively end up treated as if it were the beneficiary's own property for various purposes, including estate taxes, income taxes, and creditor protection purposes. But with the right limits in place, yes, a beneficiary can be trustee of his own trust and still accomplish many of the benefits the trust might be intended to provide. However, if creditor protection is really critical, it may be desirable for the beneficiary not to be his own trustee, and in some cases, such as one where the beneficiary is disabled or needs protection from himself for some reason, then you would not want the beneficiary to be his or her own trustee.   The rules have not changed in this regard in the past 20 years. But your mother's old attorney may have been much more conservative (or perhaps not as well-informed) as her new attorney. She could also be misremembering his advice.    Trust laws do vary from state to state, although there is a trend towards making them more standard, but the rules I've discussed above generally aren't that different from state to state.  ... Read Answer

The answer to your question is Maybe. A lot depends on how the trust is written, who created it, where the assets it holds come from, what the lawsuit relates to, and what state laws apply.   For example, in Georgia, a person cannot create a trust for her own benefit, move her own assets into it, and then claim that the assets are not subject to her creditors and judgements against her. However, a person's parents, for example, could create a trust for her benefit, move their own assets into it, and use a provision generally called a "spendthrift clause" to protect the trust's assets against most of the beneficiary's creditors and many kinds of judgments. But that protection is not perfect, the degree of protection differs from state to state and both the law of the state where the trust was created and held and the state in which the beneficiary lives can affect the protection.   Again using Georgia as an example: If the beneficiary of a trust created by the beneficiary's parents with the parents' own assets and including a spendthrift clause starts a business, runs up personal credit card debt associated with that new business, and then loses the business, resulting in a lot of credit card debt that she can't pay easily, the credit card lenders likely will not be able to touch the assets in the trust created by the beneficiary's parents. Similarly, if the beneficiary gets divorced, her ex-spouse likely can't touch the trust assets and they won't get divided up. However, Georgia does not protect against alimony award or child support award claims, so if the beneficiary fails to pay child support or alimony, the children or the ex-spouse who are owed may be able to get assets out of the trust to pay the amounts owed them. And, Georgia does not protect against tort judgment creditors, so if the beneficiary gets drunk, drives home, hits and kills someone else, and gets sued, the person suing her may be able to collect an unpaid judgment from the trust's assets to some extent.   If you are the beneficiary of a trust, or if you want to set up a trust for someone else, I strongly recommend getting an experienced estate planning attorney to help you. The attorney can help make sure that any trust is as protective as possible.  ... Read Answer

It sounds like your uncle was told the right thing. He needs to be appointed executor in order to complete the process. There is no way around this requirement.  It is unfortunate you need to complete this process for only $2,000, but your choice is do nothing and forget the money, or take the necessary steps to complete the process.... Read Answer

While an attorney is not mandatory to prepare a Power of Attorney or a Living Will, it is strongly recommended.  The expense easily survives the cost benefit analysis as both documents will assure your needs are met, if you are incapacitated.  Moreover, the POA can be used for day to day business, at your option. However, based on your comment that you want to be prepared for your death, neither document serves that purpose.  To the contrary, the POA and Living Will only provide assistance during your lifetime via an agent for the former and via health care providers for the latter. Perhaps you are seeking a Will.  If so, an attorney can advise you regarding the options and can properly prepare the documents so that your will, hence the name, will be carried out upon your death.  Both the Will and the POA must be notarized. I trust this answers your question, and if you live in the Delaware Valley, do not hesitate to call or email me on a free initial basis.   Best Regards,   Matthew R. Nahrgang, Esquire 35 Evansburg Road, Ste 400 Collegeville, PA 19426 (610) 489-3041 o (610) 489-3042 fax nahrganglaw.com     ... Read Answer

As the Trustee, you should file a Notice to Creditors in the local newspaper to begin the creditor claims period.  This essentially creates a deadline for creditors to file their claim.  It is also generally accepted in the legal industry that you have a moral obligation to use the trust assets to pay for his expenses. That being said, you can certainly make every effort to negotiate and pay less.  ... Read Answer

Under Michigan law, a Trustee is required to provide notice to all of the trust beneficiaries within 63 days of them accepting their responsibilities.  That notice ideally would include an initial inventory of assets and a description of what your beneficial interest is.  For instance, do you receive certain property or a % of all of the trust assets. If you are being provided a check and being asked to accept it as a distribution without anymore information, I would hesitate to do that without consulting with an attorney and providing more information. I hope this is helpful!... Read Answer