Payday loans are bad news and the fact they exist at all and are exempt from usury laws is as good a testament to the greed and corruption of our lawmakers as any. They are required to be licensed however, and many of the internet payday lenders are not. They are often from overseas and many times do not give their physical address. These would be the most likely to have clauses like this and would be the least likely to appear in court. If the payday loan in question here is in fact from a legit company, the clause in their contract is still invalid. One argument I keep expecting such a lender to make is that their loan should not be discharged since it was made very close to bankruptcy and that the Debtor knew at the time they would be filing and never intended to pay it back. A judge might very well be favorable to this argument, but I have not come across it in my practice. In the case of your relative, the bankruptcy clause in the contract actually works against the lender since your relative could claim they did not think they could file until they had advice of counsel. Also, I suspect it took time to get $8,000 deep. Your relative should consult an experienced bankruptcy attorney to assess eligibility, what assets, if any, may not be exempt, and what debts stand to be discharged.
Answered on Feb 07th, 2014 at 5:13 AM