PLS Check cashing service, cashed a payroll check from Longhorn Moving company for $1000.00. PLS siezed my payroll check from Williams Brothers in the amount of $651.41. I did not write the checks as they are payroll and not personal. Longhorn Moving had an account with PLS and they cleared the payroll check at the time of cashing the check in September 2011. On Friday March 9,2012 PLS took my payroll check from Williams Brothers to cover that former check from Longhorn instead of collecting from Longhorn Moving. How am I held responsible for a company issued check that had insufficient funds?
Under Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, when you endorse (the UCC uses the term "indorse") a check payable to you to a third party (such as, in this case, the check casher), you guaranty that the check will be paid. If the check is return for insufficient funds, you are liable to the check casher, which is deemed a "holder in due course," for the amount of the funds you received. This indorser guaranty is the essence of why checks pass freely in our banking system. The guaranty of collection is only one of the implied guaranties you give with an indorsement.
After the first check bounces, if you return to the check casher with a check from another employer and cash it, the check casher may apply the proceeds to your previous debt to it. This is a common-law right of offset.
The duty to collect from your former employer is yours. They paid you with the insufficient-funds check. The check casher relied on your implied warranty (which you made by indorsing the check) that the check would be "good," and you breached that warranty when the check bounced.
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.