This was done in order to use a "Declaration" of a HoA that was supposed to be incorporated in a specific name as per the Declaration, but wasn't. It was found out that the Declarant incorporated an HoA of a similar name and deeded the common property to it instead of the HoA that was supposed to be incorporated and be deeded the common property as per the declaration. This essentially has taken the common property away from the unincorporated HoA members who are not stated as the members of this other incorporated HoA in the Declaration. The similarly named incorporated HoA is misrepresenting itself in court as the Declaration HoA that is not incorporated (using the "Inc." after its' name) and then doing a "revision" on Judgment transcripts in its favor by changing the unincorporated HoA, Inc. to the name of the incorporated HoA, Inc. The Attorneys have demonstrated an ongoing pattern of doing this. The Members don't notice and think it clerical. I think it is fraud... is it?
It depends on facts that you do not provide. The real question is whether the plaintiff was able, as a result of the omission or misstatement, to obtain something to which it would not otherwise be entitled. It is not clear from your inquiry whether, or how, anyone was actually harmed by this seemingly minor issue.
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.