I understand the why attorney''s feels the need for this but in my case 4 basic issues need to be decided based on money values. As this process is costly Cannot the case just be thrown before the arbitrator and be done with it, Direct the attorney to oral argue the case. The stack of paper work generated already should be sufficient. It costs $150,000 just on the TRO. The paper work generated was ridiculous. I feel nothing of value will be generated at these depostions. Except another layer of paperwork and bills.
Your inquiry is not clear. This is *your* attorney who wants to engage in discovery? You have the right to direct him not to take depositions. Depositions are unusual in arbitration anyway.
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.