The answer is "it depends." Normally a bailee (like the shop) is not responsible for the supervening criminal act of a third party in stealing property bailed to it unless it failed to exercise ordinary care. Whether it did so is a question of fact as to which you provide no input.
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.