Is this third party data tracking done by two separate jurisdictions legal?
Asked on Nov 18th, 2021 on Civil Rights - New Jersey
More details to this question:
In July of this past year I had engaged in a family dispute at my legal residence, left the situation to go actively look at apartments across the state (different town). Nothing illegal happened in the dispute. A relative called to inquire where I was and I refused to disclose and so was tracked, with no warrant, to where I was staying by the local police in that town. I was taken to a psych unit and declared stable there (no hospitalization) and was deemed free to go. The police in the town I was in were in communication with the local police department where I came from, verifiable through the hospital. In the town I was staying in I had done nothing but watch TV and go eat at a neighboring mall. I assure you no erratic behavior of any kind took place where I was staying therefore the only feasible way that police department were to be involved and nodded to my position would have been to actively work with the department of where I came from, across the state. This was a ridiculous
Police jurisdictions work together for multiple reasons. By way of example, for wellness visits. We need to review the details. Please call. Ed Dimon, Esq. 732-797-1600 ext 235
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.