This clause is arguably contradictory insofar as it states that the Security Deposit shall be held for LET and other financial obligations which may be owed by Producer to RWP. However it previously states that the Security Deposit shall not be used for LET or rent. There is an argument that the second sentence was intended to mean that Producer shall not apply or seek a credit from the security deposit towards its ongoing obligations; however the sentence as drafted creates an ambiguity. Therefore the parties will likely need court intervention to determine the intent of the parties insofar as this provision appears to be contradictory.
Answered on May 07th, 2012 at 3:00 PM