Appellate Practice Attorney serving New York, NY
It's an interesting issue. It's true that members who joined before the change could argue that they had joined in reliance on the provision, and that the change made their agreements voidable, either because of a failure of considertion, fraud, or some other theory. Personally, I think the better argument is that anyone who joined knew that the rule could be changed by majority vote, and agreed to take that risk, just like coop or condo buyers who know that the homeowners' association rules can be changed during their membership. However, it seems to me that you could avoid all conflicts, and also be fair to everybody, by "grandfathering" in current life members.
Answered on Mar 23rd, 2015 at 8:44 AM