Public defenders are usually very dedicated and committed attorneys.? In fact, they are usually more dedicated and more hard-working than many private criminal defense attorneys.? After all, by becoming public defenders they are agreeing to take on five-times the workload of a private criminal defense attorney for less than half the pay.?Most of the people who are willing to do that are motivited by a concerted dedication to indigent defense.? In any organization, however, you will always find "bad apples."? Some public defenders in some offices might just be "treading water" - i.e. using the job solely to gain experience and biding their time until they have enough to leave the public defender's office and go out on their own. The real problem public defenders have is not lack of experience or lack of dedication, it's lack of resources. The average public defender has a case load that is five times higher than the maximum case load recommended by the American Bar Association. Also, public defender offices have very limited resources to spend on investigations, gathering evidence, hiring experts and so on. A private defense attorney is likely to have far more resources to dedicate to these areas because he will expect you, the client, to pay for them up front. Therefore, the "problem" with public defenders is not that they don't work hard. It's just that they have very limited time and resources to spend on each individual case. Since the most important case for any defendant is, of course, his own, the limited time a public defender has to devote to it often makes it seem as if they're not working very hard on it. In fact, unless you happened to get one of those rare "bad apples" assigned to you, this is not the case.
Answered on May 07th, 2012 at 3:18 PM