Whether a homicide or justifiable defense of another is at issue it your question. Deadly force typically can become a criminal charge if used in the defense of another where the deadly force outweighs the incident which is occurring. By this I mean, through example, that if a person grabs someone by the arms, a by-stander cannot stab them to death and validly claim self-defense/defense of another. The response, stabbing, far outweighs the event of grabbing. (e.g. assault). However, if the person is choking someone to death, a greater amount of force could be employed to validly claim self-defense/defense of another. The drunken state of the person is a factor to be considered, but it does not change the analysis. Your question is based on many facts which are not provided. You do not describe "attacked." You mention "saved her," but do not describe what she may be saved from. You then skip to punishment without mention of what the charge was or whether the 13-year old was charged as a juvenile and sentenced as an adult, or whether the matter was left as a juvenile charge. Your question is of such a gravity, that if this is an active case, the Internet is not the forum to raise specific questions. Rather, you may consider hiring an attorney to review the facts and present an appropriate defense after a review of the specific facts. As in all cases, the first question is culpability, e.g.: can there be a conviction? The second question is what penalty is appropriate. The will depend on what offense was charged and resulted in the conviction. Mitigating factors, such as intoxication, provocation, and other factors will effect the potential sentence.
Answered on Oct 05th, 2011 at 5:42 PM