I was pulled over for OWI and the officers reason was that I hit someone (I knew I didn’t) and then when we got to police station he said I didn’t when I asked again but was close, also gave me speeding ticket but wouldn’t say how fast or never did, then I got my report and he noted he accidentally had his microphone off that records the whole incident? How is that fair? I don’t have any of the audio evidence I could have used?
Is it fair that the officer didn't record the interaction between the two of you? Probably not, the conversation as you relate it may be helpful, the fact that the Officer had recording equipment available and chose not to use it may be raised during either your trial or other confrontational hearing.
An officer 'accidentally' not recording evidence looks very bad for him, but does not mean you automatically win the case. It is good material for bargaining with the prosecutor to get a lighter charge. You could also move to dismiss the case (after filing a demand for discovery) if they do not provide the evidence. You can argue to the judge that it looks suspiciously like the deliberate destruction of evidence, and therefore whatever the officer says is unreliable. Good Luck. p.s. You might want to hire a skilled OWI lawyer.
The issue is whether or not the authorities will have sufficient evidence to convict you of the OWI. You need an attorney. If they did not have evidence then they cannot use it against you but your attorney can argue that if it was available it would be exculpatory.
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.