Recent DUI in 2013. Back in 2001, an officer blocked me in my parked car and noticed I had been drinking. DUI was thrown out, but I received reckless.

My criminal history is this: DUI 2001. Ultimately thrown out due to officer entrapment. I did recieve a reckless driving charge. No record of DUI remains on any of my legal documents including my lifetime driving history. So, fast forward to 2013: I was charged with a DUI after a night out in Orlando. This was a different county than the first run in. Well I went to court and they would not let me enter into their first time DUI program, although I was charged with a first time DUI. The judge mentioned at the sentencing that he was concerned bc I had a prior in 2012. Which that is NOT true. My lawyer told him it must be a typo bc I had not had a DUI In 2012. So, my question is... Are they sentencing me based on them thinking that I have had a DUI in 2012 and 2013? I just don't understand how they can hold my reckless that does not even show up on any records, against me. I am just concerned that I got a raw deal bc of an assumption due to a typo! Any insight? Thank you so much!