That is really up to the judge. Your lawyer should object to a request for a continuance if an arresting officer does not show up for trial. However, almost every judge will give at least one opportunity to either side, prosecution or defense, to continue a case. After one continuance then it gets dicey. A 2nd request may be allowed but it must be a pretty good reason and your attorney should certainly object and request a dismissal.
As many times as the judge allows. Certainly there has to be "just cause" for the continuance. Simply not showing does not fall with in the definition of just cause and should result in the case moving forward without the officers testimony. If, without his/her testimony, the case against you cannot be proved, the case will be dismissed.
If the officer does not appear, the matter could be dismissed or for good cause, the court could reschedule. Typically, a court will only reschedule once.
The arresting officer would have to appear at the court TRIAL, not other court hearings. It should not be continued if he fails to appear. At the DMV appeal hearing, the hearing office could continue the hearing at his discretion, as many times as he likes.
If you are talking about thge DMV Hearing, good cause has to be shown for any continuance. If you don't have a lawyer, you wouldn't know on what grounds/caselaw to object under, and naturally they will continue it over your objection.
The DMV usually gives them two chances to appear sometimes three. They will give you your license back in the interim of the adjournments but they proceed with the hearings without the officer if the paperwork is deemed sufficient.
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.