If the defendant admitted to driving the vehicle then he gave them half of what they needed to prove, that he was operating the vehicle. The prosecutor also has to prove that he was intoxicated and that would not be likely since they do not have a breathalyzer or witnesses to the erratic driving. I am always amazed that people agree to give statements to the police, but if you are stupid enough to drive drunk In suppose you are stupid enough to admit it to the police.
Answered on Feb 01st, 2013 at 8:33 PM