We have a settlement basically all agreed to - except tuition for private school. The school is his church's school and the kids have gone there their whole lives (one in middle school one in high school). He has paid half up until the last couple of months and has suddenly stopped paying. Now my attorney just sent me this in an email: "Regarding the issue of private school tuition I spoke with him (husband's lawyer) and he said that your husband will continue to pay his one half of the children's private school tuition but he did not want a court order or that mandated he is required to pay for private school tuition. As spoke to you before if he refuses to pay private school in the future we can file a post-divorce motion requesting that he pay for private school." I think everything should be done at once in the settlement agreement - not trying to go back and get something as fundamental as this in a motion later - what do you think?
It's tough putting it in the agreement. What if he loses his job. He can change his mind if its not in there but don't let this stop you reaching an agreement and force you to trial.
You need to either trust your lawyer or fire him and find another one. This is not the appropriate forum for someone else to Monday-morning quarterback your attorney.
If this issue is important to you you should litigate it now. You can always raise it after wards but you risk the court seeing your action now as indication issue not important.
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.