That is an interesting question. The typical reason that an attorney might suggest both utilizing the same counsel would be to save time and money. This is not a typical situation, however, because the typical lawyer-client relationship is built on privileged information held by both the attorney and the client. When one attorney is representing both sides, this privilege cannot exist. If the facts of the divorce are fairly straightforward and neither side is contesting the divorce this option may make sense.
Answered on Jul 28th, 2014 at 7:29 PM