Yes. The Utah Court of Appeals ruled that in order to ensure that breath test results are presumed valid, Utah Prosecutors must present evidence of the following: (1) the breath machine had been properly checked by a trained technician, and that the breath machine was in proper working condition at the time of the test; (2) the breath test was administered correctly by a qualified operator; and (3) a peace officer observed the defendant during the fifteen minutes immediately proceeding the test to ensure that the defendant introduced nothing into their mouth during that time.[1] In order to establish that the breath machine had been properly checked by a trained technician, and that the breath machine was in proper working condition at the time of the test, Utah Prosecutors will present the following evidence: (1) Certification Report; (2) Operational Checklist; and (3) Test record printout. In order to establish that the breath test was administered by a qualified operator, the State of Utah will present the administrating officer?s current certification to administer the breath test. As you can see, there are a number of ways to attack the admissibility of the breath test results. Hope this helps.
Answered on Jan 03rd, 2013 at 7:23 AM