This depends on many factors. In Washington, one is not allowed to record audio without permission if there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. The same goes for video on the federal level. In this case, it doesn't sound like these people should have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Is the recording just video or audio and video? The granite company might have a case for defamation. However, a valid defense against a claim of defamation is that the statements are true. In this case, a claim for defamation wouldn't hold water. Finally, sometimes contracts will contain an anti-disparagement clause. Or in rare cases, a copyright clause in relation to the subject matter of the contract. These might grant the granite company some relief, so it is a good idea to have a look at the agreement. Of course, it's hard to make an exact determination given the brevity of facts. You are welcome to contact me if you would like to have this issue analyzed sufficiently.
Answered on May 01st, 2013 at 3:21 PM