QUESTION

How do I defend counterclaim for child support when counterclaim is false?

Asked on Jul 12th, 2016 on Child Support - New Jersey
More details to this question:
I filed to modify CS (increase) for 14yo and 17yo. I did this because 17yo is starting college next month and cost of living for both children has increased since 2012 (original order). Counterclaim states they want arrears credit because 17 yo lived with themq for 20 months. Its a false claim, 17yo lived with both during the week. Do I have to defend this? I have school records with my address and receipts for food, clothes etc.
Report Abuse

1 ANSWER

Family and Matrimonial Law Attorney serving Parsippany, NJ
4 Awards
It sounds like the counterclaimant is seeking a retroactive modification (decrease) of child support and therefore a credit toward the arrears based on a change in the parenting time schedule some time ago.  You have several arguments that you can bring to the court's attention to aid the court in making a determination in your favor, including, but not limited to, the fact that your 17 year old continued to reside with you during those 20 months and you remained the child's parent of primary residence or primary residential custodian during that time.  During those 20 months, you still had to maintain a room for your child; have heat, electric and water for your child; have food for your child; buy clothes for your child; pay school fees for your child; and more. The counterclaimant's child support obligation to you during that time did not stop.  You may also rely on New Jersey court rules and statutes to argue that the court should not modify child support prior to the date that you filed your application. Generally, when a motion to modify child support is made, New Jersey's "anti-retroactivity statute" only allows a modification in child support retroactive to the date that the motion was filed.  Hence, another argument is that if the counterclaimant wanted a modification of child support back then, s/he should have filed an application back then.  At this point, you may argue, the "anti-retroactivity statute" prevents the court from modifying child support prior to the date you filed your motion.  Another argument is the doctrine of laches, which essentially means too much time has passed now and any retroactive modification of child support would be prejudicial and inequitable to you. There may be other arguments available to you depending on the unique circumstances of your matter.  The attorneys at Weinberger Law Group offer a free one-hour initial consultation and are happy to discuss your options with you.  Call today to schedule your free consultation.  You may also find the below websites to be informative: http://www.weinbergerlawgroup.com/children-parenting/child-support/modifications-amendments.aspx http://www.weinbergerlawgroup.com/children-parenting/child-support/enforcement-recovery.aspx  
Answered on Jul 16th, 2016 at 5:27 AM

The information we provide is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. These answers are designed for general information only. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your specific situation. Our website, www.WLG.com, will provide you with a wealth of valuable information in addition to the best way to contact us.

Report Abuse

Ask a Lawyer

Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.

Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.

0 out of 150 characters