The necessity for at least minimal parental cooperation in a joint custody arrangement presents a thorny problem of judicial enforcement in a case wherein despite the trial court's determination that joint custody is in the best interests of the child, one parent nevertheless contends that cooperation is impossible and refuses to abide by the decree. Traditional enforcement techniques are singularly inappropriate in a child custody proceeding for which the best interests of the child is the polestar. Despite the obvious unfairness of allowing an uncooperative parent to flout a court decree, courts are often unwilling to sanction punishment of a recalcitrant parent if the welfare of the child will also suffer. However, when the actions of such a parent deprive the child of the kind of relationship with the other parent that is deemed to be in the child's best interests, removing the child from the custody of the uncooperative parent may well be appropriate as a remedy of last resort; i.e., Remedies for a parent's violation of orders relating to custody or parenting time include temporary or permanent modification of the custodial arrangement provided such relief is in the best interest of the children.
Answered on Jun 18th, 2013 at 12:46 PM