Unreasonable continuances in custody matters are contrary to public policy but common in some courts (especially LA). If the continuance was for a custody-related reason such as allowing time for a custody evaluation, you seem to have no choice. However, if it was just a court scheduling matter, your only alternative to waiting would seem to be bringing an ex parte application for an order shortening time, citing the law that provides that custody has priority over every other matter on the court's calendar except domestic violence. So if the court has divorce matters scheduled ahead of yours, you can insist on being given those dates. If the court is only hearing other custody cases, you are stuck. Usually, a judge will resist efforts to insist on the priority. Then it is a question of how much you are willing to aggravate the judge who, in the end, is the person who makes the decision about the final custody order. This is tricky stuff. An attorney would be a good idea at this point.
Answered on Apr 23rd, 2014 at 5:25 PM