As you understand, the ramifications of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in * U.S. v. Windsor* for immigration law practice are not clear yet: they have not been tested even administratively, in USCIS adjudications. It will take hundreds of cases litigated in the courts before the law could be considered settled. The opposition to the decision is tremendous, and will likely prompt the Congress to pass a law that would curb application of the *Windsor*decision; particularly, it is more likely than not that whatever immigration law reform eventually gets passed will contain provisions excluding same-sex couples from its beneficiaries. So don't think that the fight is over. On the more immediate level, if you get married, your spouse is likely to have trouble coming back to the U.S. on a non-immigrant visa. By law, a non-immigrant visa applicant must prove, to satisfaction of a U.S. consular officer, that the applicant has no intention to stay in the U.S.; a non-immigrant visa holder can be required to prove the same to satisfaction of immigration inspector at the port of entry. If your spouse indicates (as he will have to do) that he is married to a U.S. citizen, it will create a presumption that he intends to stay in the U.S. Considering USCIS position that same-sex marriage does not entitle an alien to stay in the U.S., it is diabolically perverse to deny a non-immigrant entry to such person - but the same can be said about many aspects of immigration law and practice. So, if you marry, and your spouse leaves the U.S. even for a day, he will run a substantial risk of being denied entry back into the U.S.
Answered on Jun 28th, 2013 at 1:49 PM