I was approached to develop a product for a museum type organization. We met, they verbally agreed to let me develop the project and sell it at an upcoming event. I showed general samples of the look and feel of the style of artwork. They verbally said ok and let me take the photos i needed. When i showed them the product they said it "wouldnt sell" and renigged on the whole verbal agreement. I stated that i owned the photos and would be developign the product anyway, to sell on my own. They said that if I did that they would sue me and that I didnt have the right to the photos i took. Who is correct?
The "author" (in this case, you) always owns the copyright in his own work. You own the copyright in the photos you took. Since they have not paid you and have repudiated their agreement with you, they do not have the right to copy, reproduce, publish or do any of the other things that a copyright owner can authorize.
All of the above does not mean they cannot sue you. Anyone can sue anyone for anything. If you think these photos are likely to be commercially important, you should discuss your situation with an attorney.
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.