You're correct that the Popular Science article you've cited represents prior art with respect to the ClampTite tool. Even so, it is assumed that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) considered not only this prior art reference but a number of others disclosing tools similar to the ClampTite tool you've mentioned. In fact, the patent application from which the ClampTite patent (US5148577) was granted, which indicates E. Ray Silvey as the original inventor, references several earlier patents covering similar tools.
For example, a patent granted in 1911 to Simon Schlangen (US1012282) discloses a hose-tie wrench. Others include US899657 in 1908, US1072301 in 1913, US1453940 in 1923, and US2421878 in 1947. In all, 20 patents were cited in the E. Ray Silvey patent application, each covering tools providing a similar function as the ClampTite tool. The original Silvey patent, though, was granted in 1992, which means that it has expired. However, Silvey's daughter was granted a much more recent patent in 2006. As such, it maintains several additional years of exclusivity, which prohibits others from making or selling products that infringe upon those rights granted by this patent.
Even though a patent exists covering aspects of the ClampTite tool, this doesn't mean that an inventor cannot design around this patent. For example, an inventor may create a tool that functions more efficiently or design a tool functioning in a similar way but has a different appearance. An experienced patent attorney can help you determine if your idea for a wire/clamp tool is patentable in light of the prior art that exists. Pursuing the making and selling of your idea without patent counsel may expose you to potential litigation.
Answered on Jan 07th, 2014 at 9:59 AM