These types of cases after a relationship break-up don't often go very far but I suppose his theory might be that if the improvements he paid for resulted in you receiving more money from the dealership than you would have if you sold the bike without the improvements, you should not be able to keep the money and not contribute to the cost of improvements. Your response is that he was a "volunteer" and spent the money at his own risk without any promise from you to contribute to the costs.
Answered on Feb 03rd, 2017 at 10:20 AM