There is a line to be drawn as to when it is appropriate for a lawyer to advise as to what should be done, rather than advising as to what are the legal consequences of any given decision. In other words, I can tell a client, "Your choices are A, B and C. If you do A, then here are the legal consequences, but if you do B, then this ... etc" and then it is up to the client to decide what course to take. You aren't even a client. But, let's take a look at some different scenarios. If you give in, as you point out, it will be costly. On the other hand, who's to say that she won't pull something else next? I suppose you could say, "Okay, we'll sign, but we want the money before we do any more work" Then you sign, get the money, and refuse to do the additional work. She sues you, you defend on the grounds that the agreement was void as having been made under duress. If yo do it that way, you want to make sure there is a cashier's check in hand as of the time at which you put pen to paper. Now, here's another possibility: you explain to your subs that you haven't been paid yet and you are doing everything you can to get the money. Then you give her the works: mechanic's lien, lawsuit, demand for arbitration, anything else your lawyer can think of. She will counter-claim and it will cost both of you plenty. But who knows, there may be a clause in the contract by which you can recoup. Maybe she will cave once her lawyer tells her how much it will cost her and that she's going to be on the wrong end of a judgment. Either way, lesson learned: Don't be cheap. Next time you have a project of significance, get a lawyer at the point at which you are putting the deal together. That way, you can have advance draws, an escrow agent, irrevocable letter of credit, etc. to protect yourself from this kind of situation.
Answered on Jul 01st, 2015 at 8:09 AM