According to business law, a contract without consideration is void. In this case, the loan was funded when guaranty was signed. The lender's consideration is pre-existing or post.
It sounds to me that the consideration for the guaranty was the granting of the loan. Consideration to a third person can be adequate to sustain enforcement
Why did you sign anything if the loan had already been made? If the lender said it would not make the loan unless you guaranteed it, then there was consideration [making the loan] and it is binding. You are leaving out important information.
Yes, you are correcting stating a legal principle. However, we have a common law system that looks at all of the facts and circumstances. In practice, if the guaranty is signed a few minutes after the loan, it is viewed as part of the same transaction. In most situations like this, the contract to loan the money was contingent on the guaranty being provided and the guaranty is valid.
A personal guarantee is enforceable as soon as the contract is signed and the other party completes its obligations. The consideration is in the contract itself and is between the lender and the loan recipient. The personal guarantee is merely a promise by a third party to step into the shoes of the recipient, if for any reason the recipient fails to keep his side of the agreement (i.e.: make payments as required by the contract).
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.