No. Winston is a good faith purchaser who had nothing to do with the deal between McCaslin and Graham. Graham got what she wanted for the sale of her CD player. The fact that McCaslin made a profit is irrelevant. Graham is upset because she probably figures she could have gotten more. Is the contract void because Graham was a minor (under 18)?? Doubtful because Graham was not "injured" by the deal. She got exactly what she asked for. Had McCaslin elected not to sell the CD player, would Graham be seeking a rescission? Doubtful, because the facts indicate that the only reason she is asking for a rescission is because McCaslin sold it for more than what he paid for it. Sounds like sour grapes on the part of Graham and a good economic move on the part of McCaslin. Winston is an innocent purchaser in good faith. Deal is closed.
Answered on Oct 03rd, 2013 at 2:23 PM