Luckily you were soon diagnosed appropriately and the condition was dealt with. It is unlikely that the delay in diagnosing the condition materially contributed to the outcome. Therefore, you probably do not have a financially viable malpractice case. Clearly, the first set of doctors should have done more to rule out the possibility that a heart problem being a contributing cause, but in the end analysis, you would have needed the surgery that you had anyway. You were fortunate that the outcome was not worse.
Below are some articles you may find helpful. They are written for a New Jersey audience (where I practice) but the ideas discussed in these articles usually apply in most other jurisdictions as well.
Click here for an article that discusses the three main questions I ask when deciding whether to investigate a potential medical malpractice case. This discusses the issue of financial viability.
Click here for an article that explains what you can and should expect when pursuing a medical malpractice case.
Click here, here and here for more information about me. Click here for summaries of some of the cases that I have litigated.
Answered on Jun 22nd, 2013 at 1:17 PM