The potential claim you describe would be difficult to pursue. Under rather restrictive legislation (Mcare Act) in 2003 the standard of proof in informed consent cases was changed. Whereas before, your evidence that you wouldn't have subjected yourself to the subject surgery would have been submitted to a jury. If believed, you might have received an award of damages. The standard now is that of a reasonable person similarly situated and whether they would have consented to the surgery if presented with all the risks, benefits and alternatives. Moreover, you nowhere describe an injury other than the surgery you didn't request. You also do not describe having suffered any complication, which I presume you would have mentioned if if you suffered serious complications. I wouldn't represent you in this claim because of the extreme difficulty in achieving any meaningful resolution for you.
Answered on Feb 05th, 2013 at 11:32 AM