After filing a claim with photos and repair estimates, I recently was rejected for $750 in damage to my vehicle that was due to a pothole in city jurisdiction. I am considering filing suit, but I want to make sure that my efforts will not be thwarted simply because the city claims not to have known about the pothole. To me, it is negligent maintenance - no different than me telling a highway patrolman that no one had told me my tail light was out. Thank you for your time and expertise.
First off, before you can file suit, you must put the agency on notice of your intention to bring a claim pursuant to 768.28, F.S. Then you have to wait a designated time period (I think it might be 60 days, or 90 days) before you can file the lawsuit. Don't forget the burden of proof is on you to prove that they had knowledge of the pothole with significant advance notice so that the city should have fixed it in the exercise of due care.
No. You have to prove they knew it was there and they didn't do anything about it. So, whenever you see a menace such as a pot hole, put the City on notice in writing and keep a copy. Sorry.
It is not absolute liability and if the hole was relatively small you do have to show prior knowledge. Pot holes have become a way of life. Check the scene to see if there are any signs of the City having been three recently, such as repainted crosswalks, curbs. If it is a major street it may actually be a public highway subject to State control. Be sure to first file a claim with the municipality.
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.