The statute of limitations may have expired. In NY the statute of limitations is 30 months from the most recent treatment for the condition that is the subject of the malpractice. Medical science is not an exact science, and there is no contractual guarantee that the procedure would work. So, the dr. tried the ablation first, to see if it would work. It didn't, so now the dr is advising the next step. It is up to you to accept that advice or not. The ablation did not cause the need for the hysterectomy, it simply did not alleviate the underlying condition. If the dr had done the hysterectomy without trying the ablation first, you might be complaining that he/she should have tried the more conservative step first.
Answered on Mar 15th, 2013 at 10:06 AM