You might have a case of "malicious prosecution" against your ex-wife. To win a case for "malicious prosecution" you must prove all of the following: (1) that your ex-wife caused criminal proceeding to be filed against you; (2) that your ex-wife did not have probable cause for causing the criminal case to be filed against you; (3) that your ex-wife was motivated by malice; (4) that the criminal case was a proximate cause of some damage to you; and (5) the nature and extent of that damage. The first element is established as you were arrested and charged. The fourth and fifth are also probably established. What you would need to prove is that your ex-wife did not have "probable cause" and was acting out of "malice." These may be more difficult to prove as you indicate that the charges were dropped because of your ex-wife's "inability to remember her facts and obvious lying in the courtroom." This does not mean what she said about being assaulted was not true, at least in her mind, and that she called the police out of "malice" instead of paranoia or a genuine fear for her safety. You were not proven to have not assaulted her; the charges were dismissed because your ex-wife gave conflicting versions of what occurred. This distinction is important. I would suggest contact an attorney to further discuss your rights and options.
Answered on Aug 30th, 2012 at 12:35 PM