When a person sues a doctor/nurse/healthcare professional claiming malpractice, the person has the burden of proving all of the following things: 1) That the healthcare professional had a professional relationship with the claimant, 2) That the healthcare professional did something that should not have been done, or failed to do something that should have been done, 3) That what was done (or not done) constituted a "deviation from the standard of practice in the same or similar communities," 4) That an injury was sustained, 5) And that the action (or failure to act) was a direct cause of the injury. Now when someone becomes ill or injured, that illness or injury has a natural progression that it will follow. So if the person does not get timely help, it will either get worse, or it will get better, with no intervention by anyone. So if the injured/ill person seeks timely help, then if proper care is given, the illness or injury will get better, get worse, or will stay the same. If the healthcare professional's care results in something that should not have occurred, that may very well constitute malpractice. So, having a bad result does NOT prove that the doctor made a mistake. As the Plaintiff (the person bringing the claim), you have the burden of producing competent medical testimony to establish that the doctor failed to achieve the "standard of practice," and that the failure was a direct cause of your problem. If you fail to produce that testimony, you will lose. So, you need to consult with an experienced medical malpractice attorney. In Michigan, failing to file suit within 2 years of the date on which the malpractice occurred will result in your case being barred by the Statute of Limitations.
Answered on Sep 13th, 2012 at 2:14 PM