You have a medical malpractice claim, but there are serious problems with it. First, the attorney of the doctor's insurance company will argue that your claim is barred by the statute of limitations. In New York, a medical malpractice claim must be brought within 30 months from a) the date of the malpractice, or b) the last day of continuous treatment, or c) from the date when the malpractice was discovered or should have been reasonably discovered. Your only hope is the c). The defense will argue that, since you did not go to an ENT doctor for 4 years despite continued symptoms, the delay in discovery was caused by your inaction and was not reasonable. The court might agree with them. If the court lets you proceed with your claim, the second problem will come to the fore: the burden of proof. To prevail in this case, you will have to show that the tumor was, in fact, there when the doctor failed to find it in 2009. Your attorney will call expert witnesses who will say that is is more likely than not that the tumor was there to be found; the defense attorneys will call their own expert witnesses who will say there is no way to be sure about it. The defense attorney will ask your expert witness whether there is any way of knowing whether the tumor, if it were there, was large enough to be found - and there is no honest oncologist, ENT, or any other medical specialist who will not admit that, in this case, no one can be certain. So, I would say that your odds of winning on this claim are rather small. You might still try. If you win on the issue of the statute of limitations, and the court will allow the case to proceed, the insurance company will, most likely, offer you some money as a settlement.
Answered on Oct 08th, 2013 at 2:04 PM