Sounds like this was not in California, or was it? The location of the surgery would be governed by that states laws. If it was in California, the surgeon can be held liable for medical malpractice if another physician (an expert) opines that your surgeons performance fell below the applicable ?standard of care.? But the additional hurdle to overcome is that plastic surgery is an art and you were probably forewarned that the cosmetic appearance could look poorly. As such, you probably gave your written ?informed consent? to have the surgery notwithstanding such knowledge of the risk of a poor result. In any event, in CA you have 1 year to file suit from the surgery date. Before that, (again in CA) you have to send a notice of intent to sue via certified mail to the surgeon (known as a 364 notice). The notice period is 90 days to allow for investigation and possibly settling the case without filing a lawsuit. This can be sent up to the 364th day after the surgery. You also need to see if you signed an arbitration agreement requiring you to arbitrate instead of suing in court. If you did, you still need to send the 364 notice. In a case like this, the surgeon may be willing to pay for your two extra air fares and the cost to remove the implants. It's worth a shot. There is a national reporting threshold of $30,000 which means that any settlement or verdict of $30,000 or more gets reported on the national database. Physicians hate that. Thus, many of these suits settle for $29,999.99. You should find a medical malpractice attorney in the area where the surgery occurred and ascertain your rights and options. The consultation should be free. You may have to pay for another plastic surgeon to review the records and photos to ascertain whether your surgeon fell below the standard of care. They are expensive, naturally. So be prepared for that.
Answered on Nov 01st, 2012 at 6:25 PM