When someone puts a food product into "the stream of commerce," it is guaranteed to be "fit for the purpose intended." Namely, that it is fit to eat. So, you have a claim based on 2 legal principles: 1) breach of a business contract for the purchase and sale of an edible product, and 2) breach of the guarantee the the product is fit for the purpose intended. However, you MUST prove that the food "contamination" actually is NOT candy. Example: you bite into a piece of cherry pie and break your tooth on a cherry pit. No case, because cherries have pits, and the fact is that sometimes a cherry pit ends up in cherry pie. But, if you break your tooth on a rock, there is a case, because the only way a rock could end up in cherry pie is if someone screwed up.
Answered on Oct 31st, 2016 at 6:51 PM