Crash was not my fault. I do not (did not) have rental coverage w/ my ins co. I am told I can have a total of 10 days (they gave me 8) for rental by opposing ins co. Should I dispute this? I see no reason why ANYTHING resulting from this should cost me money.
My practice is based in Massachusetts, and we have no such policy in MA regarding a set number of days allowed. However, once the at fault party pays you the book value of your car, then its responsibility is over. I would suggest the company would have no obligation to pay for a rental after that. As far as the 10 days goes, I would call your own insurance agent and ask that question. It seems unfair to me. For example, if the at fault insurance company took 20 days to get you money for your car, I would argue you should be entitled to a rental car for the entire time.
Best of luck to you.
Steven A. Schwartz
Attorney/Partner
JOEL H. SCHWARTZ, P.C.
One Washington Mall, 16th floor
Boston, MA 02108
(617) 742-1170
(800) 660-2270
(617) 250-2072 fax
sas@joelhschwartz.com
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.