QUESTION

Pot hole Damage in Tacoma

Asked on May 27th, 2014 on Automobile Accidents - Washington
More details to this question:
I hit a pot hole on my motorcycle, it damaged my front tire and both rim causing $1,700.00 in damages, I filed the claim for damages and it was denied. They responded stating" Under Washington law the city of Tacoma can be held liable for damage caused by a pothole, only if the city had notice of the defect that allegedly caused the damage and a reasonable opportunity to fix it... " and that the pot hole was reported 9 hours before I hit it, however this is short notice and did not allow the city reasonable opportunity in which to fix the pot hole. Am I completely out of luck here? I feel the city should have to pay for it, they did know about the pot hole. What constitutes reasonable opportunity?
Report Abuse

1 ANSWER

I am afraid the City is right if they actually found out about the hole 9 hours before.
Answered on May 28th, 2014 at 3:31 PM

Report Abuse

Ask a Lawyer

Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.

Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.

0 out of 150 characters