You have a right of privacy to your health history. Insurance companies/defense attorneys always ask for your entire medical health history and records, but they are only entitled to your health records regarding the area of your body that was injured in the incident giving rise to your claim. If you had uterine cancer or a broken hand, or torn rotator cuff, what does that have to do with your broken leg? Nothing. You can object or obtain a protective order to limit the scope of records produced. They do not get to go on a fishing expedition unless they can somehow show that it?s causally related or?directly relevant.? I have successfully fought these on numerous occasions, but it is time-consuming and many plaintiff?s personal injury lawyers are too busy to want to go through the hassle of preventing the production of all of your medical records. But I fight these because it always seems that they find discrepancies in the medical records if they get them all. Doctors and nurses make mistaken entries in medical records all the time. In fact, I don't think I have ever had a case where the records were 100% accurate. Defendants look for that. They try to find something contrary from what you testify to in a deposition to show you have either a faulty memory or are lying. You might say I had a broken right ankle when I was 18, but the records mistakenly say left ankle. Not a big deal, but if there are 2, or 3 or 4 of these mistakes, if could affect your credibility, even if the records are wrong and you are not. A jury will likely believe a doctor's records are more accurate than your memory. So it may be worthwhile if you have a good case to fight a comprehensive production of records.
Answered on Nov 14th, 2012 at 2:02 PM