This is hardly a legal issue. Common sense calls for getting a second opinion, preferably, from a doctor who is not associated with your current physician. If the other doctor does not think the changes in your spine are "normal", transfer your treatment to him/her. Getting an attorney involved at this stage is premature and counterproductive. It is premature because you do not yet know whether your current doctor is right or committing a malpractice in your case. It is counterproductive because, if your physician thinks he is about to get sued, it will not improve the quality of the treatment you are receiving. Think about it: it is not really likely that your doctor knows that he is not treating you right and intentionally withholds proper treatment, is it? So, there are two possibilities - a) your doctor is incompetent, or b) your doctor is right about your condition and treats you correctly. If he is right,and you threaten to sue, the doctor will be right to feel offended and resentful, which will not make him treat you any better.
Answered on Dec 04th, 2012 at 11:58 AM