Once a case is settled, you cannot reopen it to get more money even if you feel that the settlement was unfair. I would have to know a lot more about the case before I can say whether you should have settled for more. I will say this, in most cases, you settle for less than the full value of all of your damages, and even though it is for less than full value, it is in your best interest to do this. In some cases, the issue of whether the incident (such as a wreck) caused all of your injury is disputed. Rather than take a chance that you will get little or nothing, you compromise and get a larger settlement than the Defendant wants to pay, but less than your total damages. In a Med Mal case, liability is usually disputed. The Defendant likely had an expert prepared to testify that the misdiagnosis was not a result of negligence, but that, given the information the doctor had, any reasonable physician could have made the same misdiagnosis despite exercising all due care. In that case, you have a choice of rather to go to trial and get all of your damages, or compromise. You probably did the right thing.
Answered on Nov 03rd, 2011 at 5:37 PM