It is difficult to prove a DUI case based solely on a blood or urine test that is positive for THC for the reasons you state in your question. Unlike a certain level of alcohol in our blood (.08 or above), it is difficult to infer a level of impairment based on a level of THC in your system. However, if it is what we call a "legal draw", that is a blood sample taken at the request of an officer based on the implied consent law, as opposed to a "medical draw", blood drawn and analyzed at a doctor's request for purposes of medical diagnoses, the blood (or urine in the case of a urine sample) will be analyzed by SLED (if you are in SC) and they will determine the quantitative level of THC in your blood. They will be able to distinguish recent use from prior use that leaves a small amount in your system. If law enforcement suspected you were under the influence based on the circumstances, such as bad driving, slurred speech, dilated pupils, failed field sobriety tests, ect., and if you tested positive for THC, you will likely be charged with DUI (if you haven't already been) unless it is obviously a trace amount. If that happens, you should retain an attorney review the case. The police must have adequate probable cause to even ask you to submit to drug testing, there is the problem that I mentioned with proving a level of impairment based on a certain drug level, and the testing procedures might have been defective. These are a few of the many issues that should be reviewed before you just pay the fine and plead guilty if you are charged with DUI.
Answered on Sep 05th, 2012 at 9:31 PM