Dog bite cases are not unlike any other negligence action. You must have proof that the owner knew their dog had a propensity to bite others. If the dog has in fact bit other children, then of course they are on notice. In general, in dog cases, the owner can get away with one bite because they will claim they had no knowledge of their dog's tendency to bite others, but once that first bite occurs, they have knowledge and can be held liable in some circumstances. This is NOT a strict liability matter, which means if the child is poking at the dog, being mean to the dog, persists while the dog is warning the child by snarling and snapping (short of biting) but the child persists, the owner may have a defense and certainly a jury would not consider that type of behavior as one that would be rewarded with a money award. Call if you have further questions.
Answered on May 24th, 2011 at 11:33 AM