A friend of mine asked me to lend him my car to drive it to work. I was out of the country and another friend had the keys. I instructed her to let him drive my car and give him the keys. Instead of driving the car only to work, he borrows the car to my friend who had the keys but I never gave her the permission to drive. When I returned, I noticed the car was scratched. The estimated damage is around $400. He claims that he did not hear when the car scratched. She claims that she drove the car only when the two of them were together. Both of them agree the car was damaged while I was gone. I claim that the friend who I lent the car to is responsible for paying the full damage since I never authorized anyone else to drive. He refuses to pay and claims that since he never heard that he scratched the car he did not damage it and will at most pay half of the damage.
The logical way to work this out would be for each of them to pay 1/2 the cost to repair. In court, this would be a hard case to prove. The explanation of why would require a dissertation on bailment law. Resolve it informally if possible.
You have a claim against both. The driver who actually caused damage and your friend who without your permission gave your car to someone else to drive.
You will prove who had lawful use of the car and who caused the damage. Don't think it will be worth the time effort and cost to small claim the matter. Take what you can get and be careful about who you let have your car .
Consumers can use this platform to pose legal questions to real lawyers and receive free insights.
Participating legal professionals get the opportunity to speak directly with people who may need their services, as well as enhance their standing in the Lawyers.com community.