In a hearing the ALJ asks the vocational expert a series of hypothetical questions. Some are favorable to you. Some are not. It appears the ALJ decided the medical evidence did not support the questions that were favorable to you. Instead, the ALJ decided the medical evidence supported his/her conclusion you could do some form of work and were not totally disabled. You are correct in saying on an appeal the Appeals Council does not reverse the ALJ unless the ALJ ignored medical evidence that was overwhelmingly in your favor. Although you stated what the ALJ said at the hearing, you did not state what the ALJ said his finding was in the actual decision. Apparently, he/she found you could do some form of work. You needed to say specifically what the ALJ said.
Answered on Apr 28th, 2017 at 7:12 AM