The problem is not whether the estate is bound, the problem is whether the child is bound. The estate has the same problem parent would have had collecting this loan, but with an additional twist. The problem is proving it's a loan, and not a gift. The best evidence of parent's intent is parent's testimony, which is now unavailable. If child was making repayments that gives you some evidence. You may also have some indication that this was an "advance" on the child's share of the estate. It's all about what objective evidence you can find and remember, "Dad said" doesn't work, that's hearsay.
Answered on Jul 26th, 2013 at 2:36 AM