The newer, February 21 will might not be valid. It would be invalid if due to the medications your ex husband could not understand what the implications were of doing the February 21 will. The test is how he was at the time on February 21 that he signed it, not his general condition while hospitalized. Evidence might be what was in his medical chart leading up to and on that day, and if anyone can, with their recollections refreshed from reviewing the chart or in any other way, explain his mental condition on that specific day. On such evidence, a court might find that your ex husband did not have the mental capacity to make a will on that day. Also, the February 21 will is not valid if his son imposed his desires on his father, your ex husband if it can be shown to the court's satisfaction that your ex husband wanted on February 21 something else to happen to his assets after his death. This would be undue influence by the son over your ex husband. If the February 21 will favored the son more than prior wills (as applied due to the divorce, as explained below), and is contrary to what your ex husband had perhaps consistently expressed as his wishes in prior wills, a court might find from the evidence that the son exercised undue influence over your ex husband. Even if you are successful in convincing the court to invalidate the February 21 will, it might not gain you anything. Unless the earlier will specifies otherwise, your divorce invalidated those parts of the earlier will (made when you were yet married) that 1. gifted any property to you. 2. specified you to be the executor. Essentially, the earlier will is then applied as if you had died before your ex husband did.
Answered on Nov 14th, 2012 at 6:30 AM